Why We Art

Why We Art is an essay about creativity, education, critical thinking and how The Arts can help. Developing concentration and freedom of expression through artistic study builds a mindset and framework that overflows into all aspects of our lives.

We have lost our attention spans, our ability to focus, our moral compass, and worst of all, we have lost our understanding of critical thinking. 

The digital onslaught of information in our society can be overwhelming. Media distractions can either 1) shift focus away from reality or 2) provide underlying support for a cause or behaviour. Fake news in today’s world has become the perfect tool for audience distraction. In Johann Hari’s book, Stolen Focus, he discusses the internet as a marketing machine designed to control and direct every moment of our screen time for someone else’s benefit, mostly for monetary gain but more insidiously for influencing outcomes. 

As Hari suggests, resistance is futile. The internet is driven by thousands and thousands of the world’s best programmers whose sole mission is to deprive you of choice. Every click-bait is designed to pull you into the next click-bait giving the illusion that you are making your own decision for the next pageview. You are not. You are being led to where the programmers want you to be. Online manipulation is a proven science and we are at their mercy. In hunting for a good will moment, we must realize that our inability to focus is not our fault. We are but pawns.

The arts are discussed here as a moving-forward solution to our diminishing powers of concentration. Through artistic study, we develop, in simple terms, a “big picture” approach to analysis and problem solving. 

The education system today promotes the development of critical thinking. Studying the arts – literature, music, visual arts, pottery, etc. – introduces subjectivity (not just objectivity), abductive reasoning (not just deductive reasoning), and integrative thinking (not just linear thinking), and it is these qualities that provide the needed creative foundation for success.

Subjectivity is rooted in individual perspectives, emotions, feelings, and opinions, which can vary from person to person. Objectivity, on the other hand, is based on verifiable facts, research, and data, independent of personal biases, making it essential for scientific, technical and neutral reporting. Objectivity discourages out-of-the-box thinking thereby restricting creative potential.

Abductive reasoning is often referred to as our gut-feeling and is typically based on general information acquired over time through life experience. Although the potential is huge for abductive reasoning to be clouded with emotion and misinformation, it is still effective as a starting point to form creative hypotheses for further examination. Many ideas derived through abductive reasoning that may begin as whimsical or tangential become practical over time. Deductive reasoning begins with a hypothesis and through analysis and exploration, attempts to arrive at a logical conclusion justifying the hypothesis. Scientific method is based on it. But conclusions arrived at through deductive reasoning can only be as valid as the premises upon which they are built.

The integrative thinking methodology, inherent in artistic study, provides an infrastructure that fosters the creative and analytical thought processes required in all aspects of life. It scaffolds a framework that rises above the limitations of an “A or B” (either/or) solution to seek new and creative solutions that accommodate both A and B. It promotes a broader awareness of possibilities. Linear thinking, on the other hand, is based on a logical sequence of thought processes, which tends to discourage the freedom to explore tangential options. 

Integrative Thinking theory was developed by Graham Douglas in 1986. Douglas describes it as “the process of integrating intuition, reason and imagination in a human mind with a view to developing a holistic continuum of strategy, tactics, action, review and evaluation for addressing a problem in any field.” 

Roger L. Martin is a Professor Emeritus at the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto. Martin’s 2007 book The Opposable Mind builds on Douglas’s theory to define a creative process that relies on salience, which is the ability to identify and prioritize the most vital variables in a problem while ignoring extraneous noise. Possible solutions are presented that include not just A or B, but options that could include A, B, C, D and E that become viable through a variety of non-direct connections. The discovery process, inherent in all artistic study,  opens a  world of new possibilities and options.

Martin also makes an excellent case for the use of abductive reasoning (“gut feeling”) as opposed to relying solely on inductive and deductive reasoning to arrive at decisions. Because of its flexibility and untethered freedom from limitation, abductive reasoning can be used as a starting and finishing point in the creative process. 

Martin distinguishes between integrative thinkers versus conventional thinkers and suggests that we can train ourselves to dig deeply and creatively for more comprehensive solutions. With increased exposure to the discovery process, he believes we develop a “habit of thought” that becomes our natural method for analysis and decision-making in all aspects of our lives. Integrative thinking is a skill that develops over time with repeated practice. 

The arts naturally encourage the repeated application of subjective, abductive and integrative thinking. Stimulating these attributes repetitively on a regular basis engrains the process as standard. It is in this way that study in the arts improves the potential success of study in all aspects of life. Put another way, how do you get to where you want to be? Practice, practice, practice.

Study in the arts is not about finding answers. It is about discovery. It is about building critical thinking skills through subjective, abductive and integrative out-of-the-box thinking. 

One of the objectives of meditation is to slow mental activity to let the subconscious mind bubble up without judgement or control. Many individuals express their desire to “stop the noise” or “clear their thoughts.” Many explore meditation to “improve their focus” or “help them concentrate.” The quest for “inner peace and tranquillity” is common and many attach religious overtones to the process, which, while important, is not a requirement for meditative success. 

Technology has dramatically limited our capacity for calm and reflective examination. Social media platforms encourage spontaneous emotional reactions and the few seconds typically allotted between receipt and response leave little time for sober second-thought or moral consideration. It is a challenge to maintain composure, and the current social and political arenas of hatred, narcissism, selfishness and bullying tend to inspire knee-jerk reactions.

Critical thinking is somewhat of an art form. It requires diligence, patience, commitment, integrity and a desire for truth. Studying the arts gets you out of the box and into a world of possibilities. Critical thinking is a discipline that can be learned. 

Clarity of thought requires a healthy mind. Studies in addiction and mental health have shown that developing social connections through community involvement, especially in music-making ensembles, such as choirs, can have a profound effect on physical and mental well-being.

Anecdotal stories regarding the success of music for improving health abound, and many are supported with scientific studies. Some of the researched benefits and attributes of singing in a choir include the following:

rhythmicity (auditory and motor neuron connectivity)
synchronicity (group breathing and heart rates)
stress relief (cortisol decrease)
physical therapy (abdominal and facial exercise)
creativity (improvisational expression)
depression management (serotonin increase)
communal participation (primal needs of engagement)
“happiness” (increases in both oxytocin and dopamine).

Participating in The Arts, a forum that implicitly features non-invasive, non-chemical, community-based and artistically-driven mental health solutions, can improve the quality of our lives.

WWBD: Identifying Malignant Narcissists

Bluto – Popeye FB

Much of our mental health journey revolves around optimising conditions to support an environment of mindfulness and peace. I have written in the past about the mental, physical and cognitive benefits found through experiencing music and community.

However, external forces beyond our control can shake the foundation of our ambitions and achievements. How can we push back against these distractions to maintain the serenity and calmness required for a healthy mind?

Popeye the Sailor was a 1960s cartoon depicting the seaside life of three individuals: Popeye the sailorman, Olive Oil the love-interest, and Bluto the angry bully. The Bluto character was large, bumbling and vindictive, and he served up much of the comedy in this classic cartoon. When angry, which was often, his eyes bulged and his nostrils flared. Malignant narcissists, for me, emulate Bluto and this imagery helps me disarm much of the natural reactions that tend to disrupt logical coherent thought.

In many ways, Bluto’s despicable behaviour represents a disturbing trend in today’s society; the general acceptance of declining decency, integrity and respect. The good news is that he presents himself with such ferocity and consistency that his behaviour (his Playbook) becomes obvious and predictable. Why is this good news?

It is good news because when encountering difficult individuals in our lives, comparing them to a known entity simplifies the list of available and effective relief mechanisms. Understanding other’s motivations and actions can clarify and help enable a better and healthier response. Of the many mental health disorders that may be attributed to Bluto, none shine so brightly as that of Malignant Narcissist.

WWBD: What Would Bluto Do? If the person causing you grief reminds you of Bluto’s behaviour, find below practical coping skills.

Wikipedia offers a quick and simple summary: Malignant narcissism is a psychological syndrome comprising a mix of narcissism, antisocial behavior, sadism, and a paranoid outlook on life. Lists of other attributes are well-documented, readily-available and can include, but are not limited to, the following:

Unaccountability
Doubling-down on personal opinions
Misdirected anger
Deflection from actual issues
Distraction from actual issues
Limited sense of humour and humility
Hatred of being challenged (i.e. fact-checked)
Hatred of being mocked or ridiculed (i.e. laughed at)
Hostility when confronted
Inability to handle criticism
Aggression and potential violence
Disregarding the rights of others
Content to create pain, frustration, and heartache in others
Lack of empathy
No remorse
Unapologetic
Tendency to blame others for their own bad behaviour
Self-centred, self-as-victim viewpoint

It is important for the malignant narcissist to control their self-as-victim story. In most situations, a narrative is developed that positions themselves in the best possible light. Alternate-facts are then created in support of their story. Dissenting opinions are unwelcome and the wagons circling their bubble are well-armed with falsehoods and vindictive attacks. Malignant narcissists display the attributes of a typically childish and insecure bully.

The main characters in the WWBD Playbook include the following:

  • The narcissist
  • The target victim
  • The audience
  • The fact-checker

    The Playbook character-list can be applied to any type of environment including business, society and family. In government infrastructure, the narcissist could be a political leader. The target victim could be anyone that does not fit into the narcissist’s narrative. The audience could be the general public. The fact-checker could be anyone or anything that questions the narcissist’s statements, and by definition they, too, then become a target victim. The Playbook is brutally simple and shallow. The audience is manipulated through distraction and repetition to focus on perceived threats. Anger punctuates all attacks. Facts are not necessary in this model and the bigger and louder the lie, the more likely the popular belief. The credibility of the fact-checker/target-victim is aggressively undermined and their attempts to sway the audience become more and more futile.

Applying a similar Playbook framework to our daily activity is relatively straightforward; identify the players and plug them in.

The malignant narcissist will seldomly address facts directly, choosing rather to divert attention to secondary or unrelated issues. Their distractions will position themselves as the victim and lead the audience to be victims as well, creating an environment of faux commiseration and support.

It is a fantastic time in our society to be a malignant narcissist. Accountability and integrity are rarely seen. Lying is expected. Division and outrage are fashionable. Victimization is a requirement. The state of society’s mental health is at an all-time low and hope can be elusive. Search online “victims of malignant narcissists” for more information.

What can we do to protect ourselves and our mental health against these vicious attacks on reality?

B L U T O

BOUNDARIES: Weak boundaries are readily exploited. Be as firm as possible with setting your terms of engagement but keep your expectations low. Boundaries are rarely observed and many (most) professionals recommend avoiding contact with malignant narcissists.

LET-IT-GO: Expecting fairness or an apology from a malignant narcissist is futile. Feeling shame is not part of their wheelhouse, nor is the possibility of a logical conversation, so let those go as well. Avoid contact.

UNDERSTAND: Distraction and deception are important parts of the WWBD Playbook. Statements are made to deliberately disrupt your line of thought and undermine your confidence. Be aware, be observant, be detached, be insightful.

TRUTH: Be strong. It may be necessary to expand the circle of avoidance to include audience members. Individuals that have fallen prey to the malignant narcissist’s distractions and deceptions are not necessarily against you, but their views can undermine your efforts for positive health and wellbeing.

OPTIMISM: Psychological manipulation is guaranteed and building an emotional resilience through networking and/or counseling can help. Search for a support community. We have control over our own actions and reactions. Keep it light and know that NONE OF THIS IS YOUR FAULT.

What Can YOU Do? You can understand the workings of the malignant narcissist mind, and, as difficult as it may be, try to act and react fairly and appropriately. Be a fact-checker. Call out deception and lies. Be aware of the malignant narcissist’s tactics. Audience members need to be fact-checkers. We ALL need to be fact-checkers because passive compliance creates casualties. A confidently delivered statement is not necessarily true (Dunning Kruger). Be vigilant. Be fair.

Take care of yourself. Keep humour close by. Join a choir. Help somebody today. A healthy mind is about community.